There are some great topics covered in this channelling session. The big picture topics of what the planet needs to re-balance and how our past lives are changing history, through to individual pathways and what we can do to move that process forward in our own lives which of course benefits the Whole.

I’ll try to link back to as many references as I can. I’ve been interviewing Mercredan for 4 years now and the progression of conversations have been extraordinary so reading past conversations that are mentioned here can be useful if you don’t understand what is being said. If you have any questions or want to set up a discussion around the topics (rather than just throwing abuse which is no help to anybody – much less yourself) come visit the Facebook or Google Plus pages and write your comments there.

My comments added after the recording are in italics.

Mercredan session

Channelled by Francis Evans 25 August 2015

Interviewed by Annabelle Drumm

Topics: Altering life within a limited context, reincarnation, altering history, altering resonating lives, resolution, karma, completion, return journey, female sexuality, the lock and the key, masculine and feminine, female oppression, Polyamory, the Warrior and the Fortress Maker, unconditional love, rearing children, Warfare causing disturbance to the balance between masculine and feminine

BEGIN

—-

M: Good morning. Once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few minutes of your time. So many things change so very rapidly and the escalation as One begins to move towards the centre. It has been pointed out as One moves towards the centre of a spinning top the revolutions seem to go much faster until One arrives at the core, at the centre. That is always the truth for any system whatsoever. When One reaches the absolute, then One can easily be at peace because One is still, One is stable and it is clear what has been occurring. So that is enough to begin a conversation because you have a lot of thoughts and shall we try to integrate all of them to bring them to the stillness as well.

Altering life within a limited context

A: Wonderful. Thank you. OK. Um… I have a few questions about “the Author” to start with. What I wanted to know “As I dissolve my impressions that are no longer beneficial for self or for others, do I dissolve them for the Author too?”

M: Mm, interesting. You understand, the Author is simply a way of describing something because the difficulty is One always has to use an imperfect language in order to convey something. So let us say that the Authority resides at the edge of Potential. We have already spoken about the Unknowable, the Unknown and the Known.

A: Yes

M: The Known world is, shall we say, the materialised form and the Unknown is the potentials that are available within the context of the already materialised. One truly has to step into another “being” or another reality if One is not going to continue within the originating context. So, from that point of view, the Author is simply considering potentials and making them fit the context. As One alters the contextual viewpoint, One is allowing the Author better range of potentials in which to put One’s signature. If we were to represent this as the President, the Authority then agrees by signing the papers. Do you know what I mean?

A: Yes

M: So, the Author really is simply deciding in agreement with how the new approach will be tackled as it were. How One brings the new potentials into existence without causing too much disruption within the ongoing framework of experience. Not so much for yourself but for others who are trying to fit along the way. You understand you have your friends and your family and your neighbours and your history all wanting to be able to follow and if suddenly they are confronted with a totally different set of circumstances it is … disruptive.

A: Disruptive (laughs) is the understatement of the year. So why do you say not me?

M: I am not following what your question is.

A: You said not me but my neighbours and friends…

M: … because within yourself one could shift anything because you have already recognised the “me” is the Author itself. You are looking at all the potentials and sifting through them and causing One to plan the ongoing evolution. Even if it is at a rather less than total conscious decision.

(I often get a little confused when Mercredan uses the word “you”. Usually when he’s giving a lesson on how any of us can be, he uses the word “One” and if he’s talking about my personal life he uses “you” but, not always. The “you” above is meant generically in the statement above. When any of us change the contextual viewpoint and make a change in our lives, our friends and family can be disrupted. It was not a personal comment.)

A: Right… Less than a total conscious decision?

M: Not so much unconscious but shall we call it pre-conscious. You understand it is sitting there in the background but as yet not entirely formulated because One has also to understand the reflections to occur. In other words, when One changes the centre of focus then the new reflections have to become stabilised and also interpreted. Does that make sense?

A: It does. It does.

Reincarnation, altering history, altering resonating lives, folding back, resolution, karma, completion, return journey

A: I have been doing some work with another person on resonating lives which we found very interesting. Not just visiting them but even possibly changing them. Is that what we were actually doing?

(Body Wisdom sessions with JeffreeRainbowBeing.com  in New York state. They are extraordinary!) 

M: That is the case. The point is that at the end of the Shift, that is in some significant period of time

(I had the impression this may be around 1000 years though this may be shortening now)

M: all lifetimes will have arrived at resolution and in doing so there is no further disturbance. That is the vibrations that are the incompleteness will no longer be heard as such and therefore the resonance will simply dissipate. Does that make sense?

A: It does. So in that work, we were trying to work out that, if this work was actually changing those lives, it would be changing anybody that was resonating with those lives and the lives around them.

M: Of course.

A: So that’s huge! That’s huge work.

M: You understand that the history of your people is then being completed. You understand this is why it is a return journey. That which was left incomplete is finally being put to rest.

A: And are there lots of people around the world doing this work?

M: Consciously and unconsciously, that is the case. You have to remember there are significant numbers of threads that are uncompleted in the overall tapestry so there is plenty for everyone to do…

A: (laughs) There is. There is.

M: … and of course when these are completed, so the speed of completion increases and while it seems an indeterminable task. In reality it is not so difficult nor so time consuming to complete.

A: No. And a finite thing to do.

M: Of course.

A: Because I’d heard it being called a “folding back”. That we fold back on all that history and resolve it …

M: Of course because in completing One begins to understand the entirety of the beginning of the thread in itself and this is why those who are still leaving your framework incomplete will of course have to re-energise in a different framework in order to bring about that completion and therefore their own incomplete life. You understand?

(So once our whole history has folded back and resolved all that is not love, those who left this lifetime “incomplete” – that is, with baggage – will not be able to use our history as their place to resolve karma and baggage issues. They will need to look for another place to do it.)

A:  Yes. So is that when you were saying they will have to go back through history to find a place to do that?

M: Of course. That is the reality and therefore it is not a punishment. It is an opportunity in order to complete and like all things it is done for the best of intentions.

A: Mm, ok I understand that. Is there anything else we need to say about the resonating lives and the Author?

M: That is plenty for the moment until your questions stimulate because, like all of these, we are building a temple. That is, One has to have a plan, One has to have structure but even then One has to put in the foundations before One even begins to fit all the great artistic…

A: The fun stuff. (laughs)

M: Correct.

Female Sexuality

A: Ok, well I’d like to move on to another subject now. We had talked in our last session about sexuality. My question is “How do I freely express my sexual self, my feminine divine, without terrifying or exciting the people around me?” (laughs)

M: First of all, like everything, One has to understand oneself. One has to understand which side of the polarity was embodied in the beginning (male or female) and what does that mean? One has to realise that One can only terrify Oneself.

A: Well that’s possible. If my sexuality came out that might be rather terrifying. (Based on what we hear of how powerful the feminine divine is.)

M: Of course. And then One would be behave in a terrifying fashion to others around yourself.

A: But if I’m trying to understand self and being my true self…

M: Then you have to look at what is it about sexuality that is so frightening for every human being? What is it that keeps everyone so caught up in this…

A: Well, it’s powerful and it’s hard to resist.

The Lock and the Key, Masculine and Feminine

M: Of course and also it is the Key. If you are to look at it in that term then you would have to say this. The feminine is like a lock. You cannot get inside with just a lock. You have to have a key. But how can you put the key in to the lock if it is guarded?

(This is not referring to the sexual act. This is more an analogy for opening your heart or your inner self. It is still possible to have sex and not open your inner self.) 

M: You understand, old fashioned locks have a guard that covered it up. So One has first of all to let the key in. One has to open the guard and allow in the key. But which key are you going to let in? Because only one design will suffice.

(notice he doesn’t say “one key” as if only one man has it. Rather, only the men with that design of key.)

M: And, what is behind the locked door? In terms of this analogy, it is the lock that can see from both sides. The lock can see what is inside. The key can only do that by being allowed to enter.

A: So how can I see what the lock sees?

M: When One turns focus away from the key and looks deeper inside Oneself, what is it that the feminine is protecting? As we have pointed out, the divine is indeed Feminine, and so what is behind that locked facade as it is? What action will occur if One were to open up the doorway? Then, there are some components that we could put in. First of all, it requires both the masculine and the feminine to open the doorway and it has to be the correct design of key to fit the lock. The lock will not open to any key at all.

A: So how do you find the right designed key?

M: One is showing One’s design. One is calling for the correct key knowing full well that once you open up, you are opening up to the Divine power. The combination of masculine and feminine applied through this mechanism then has total access to the power of the Divine itself. So then One should be careful of what One invites.

A: Yes. We did speak of that once before.

M: So the point is how can you ask for your key if you do not know what your design is? You understand?

A: Yes I do. So is it just getting into meditation to have a look and get to know the design?

M: Of course and it is also to totally understand what it is to be feminine. You asked the question what is it to be feminine, but the only possible answer is within because to be feminine is one thing, to understand the design of your lock, what is the inside of yourself, without the guard – because, isn’t it so true that the feminine is protective of itself. The feminine often does not want to be opened up – so how are you going to let somebody in with the right key if it means you will be opening up? That means you will be defenceless.

A: Yes that’s right. So it needs to be someone you can build a great trust with.

M: Of course. But also One has to trust Oneself. Because putting it this way, you are the only one that understands that power is behind the door. This other One (man)  can unlock but cannot know that power is such as it is. So there is nothing to be afraid of by being opened up. Because first of all, it is you that will gain access to the power because you are already expecting it. The masculine only wants to open you up.

A: Yes (laughs) I just wonder if this is why the masculine has been so determined to guard the female for so many thousands of years.

M: Let us say the masculine has been trying to open her up for many thousands of years. It is not the masculine who…

A: Then why does the masculine oppress?

M: You put it that way but, put it another way. The feminine is completely frightened of her power. Shall we call it, “terrified” of what it means to be opened up. So what is she going to do? What is she going to say about the guard? Because if it is only her who is protecting the power then she will not let him in. So, while you say that it is he who is oppressing her, I would say she is oppressing herself because she is frightened of what that means and this has been the case for a very long time. How she does that is through denial by holding on to herself. By avoiding being opened up.

(This reminds me of a lively discussion I got into on Beyonce’s music video about Girls: We Run the World. I pointed out she added two side kicks for herself who were men on the side of the women. I said in the real world you could add thousands of women on the other side who would protest if women became more empowered and the conversation showed that. Looking back at the conversation now I can also clearly see the “competition” between male and female.)

A: So if I look at this from the big picture point of view and not just of myself, is it just going to be one by one that each feminine will be able to discover the design and be more free in opening up and using their power?

M: It will be one by one that a female will discover femininity. It is the female that has avoided femininity and so on it goes. The entire story line is not what it seems from the outside.

Female Oppression

A: It’s true. I look at women being covered up with lots of clothes or having their genitals mutilated… so many rules and limitations set up around the world in all different cultures. Surely that’s not what females have done to guard themselves?

M: You do not understand how that operates. You understand this. In many societies the process is set by the feminine. It is set in a way because that protects the feminine from dealing with the external world. You have a different view of course and in your process, sexuality has been used as a tool for control. Whose tool is controlling? Of course the feminine wiles control most of it because it is what is so “dangled” in front of your man. It is dangled but not allowed. It does not allow anyone to open up and the result then, is frustration. The masculine that has put his key into a lock that will not open is in the wrong place and, should we say in the analogy, it is the feminine that can reorganise the design of the lock, then who is it that is controlling it? Otherwise the masculine would have to have a ring of keys and try each one in order to find something that might work.

A: So the feminine can reorganise the design?

M: I am simply saying that once One begins to delve into the feminine and access the inner power, then One will take away One’s fear of it. There are so many stories propagated across the planet and when you begin to make up a story, not too long before others will apply it. Of course in the physical world, the masculine is dominant. That is because it is a world of formations but it is not where power lies. Do you understand what I mean?

A: In theory, yes. I guess I will learn more as we go along.

M: The point is what are you frightened of? What is it that would take away your protection? How can you move aside your guard when you don’t trust someone? If you are holding the idea that men are the controllers and men are doing this to women all over the world and men are the problem…

A: That’s why the guard is up.

M: Of course! Whether or not it is truth, of course it is in the world of those that create it…

A: Yes, in my world.

M: … but what evidence do you have in truth? Really only that which you choose in order to maintain the idea.

(ie – whatever you believe, you will keep looking until you find evidence of it. Look in your own surroundings. Do not rely on the media to give you your evidence.)

A: Yes. I know a long time ago when my husband left I wondered if it were possible for a man to truly love a woman like in the love songs. And then, sure enough, I saw more and more couples where I could see that, definitely. So, I know that it was possible even though I hadn’t experienced it myself.

M: And what is it that you want to experience? If you want to experience that, then you have to trust the Universe. In other words, every masculine impression that you are impressing upon the environment has to be One of trust. So if you are walking down the street and you‘re finding another example of someone who frightens you, then what is it about yourself you cannot trust?  You understand, once you realise that power is at hand. It is at hand but it requires BOTH to open the doorway. Very important in terms of the evolution of consciousness in the new framework and as yet this is the biggest hurdle. The biggest stumbling block because so many have decided that the other is to be distrusted.

A: Mm, which messes it up because they never get the key in the lock.

M: Of course

A: And then you have all the homosexual couples as well who are more than happy where they are in defending their position.

M: Of course and two locks won’t….

A: (laughs)

M: … manage it and two keys won’t do it either. It is part of the necessity of polarity.

A: That’s right. OK.

Polyamory, the Warrior and the Fortress Maker, unconditional love, rearing children

A: Now I’ll just quickly check on other questions because I am aware of the time. Last question: “Regarding the future society being poly-amorous, how does the Warrior / Fortress Maker idea fit into that? How can a man build an empire on a rock that’s not always there for him?”

M: Much more difficult a question because Societies make rules for protecting itself. How can One truly become poly amorous, as you put it, without first of all discovering love? Love, as we pointed out, is the ability to allow someone freedom. What more freedom is there than to access power? Power is to open up one gateway. One doorway that allows power. Is it then possible to allow that key to open another doorway? Or for the lock to invite another …

A: A new key.

M: You understand what I mean. If One truly loves something then you will love whatever it wants. Without all the references to the ideas that it holds, “if someone were to love another it automatically means they no longer love myself”. And of course, that is limited love. By its definition, it separates you from the Divine.

A: I understand that and how polyamory works. I just want to go back to an analogy you gave me a long time ago which I love, the Warrior and the Fortress Maker. I see this in society, is the Warrior wants a Fortress maker on which to build a Fortress and if that…

M: You understand because the nature of the road (? @ 1’07’48) shall we put it, One is building a sustainable society. One opens to having family, that is to procreate at the bottom level of organisation. Of course, procreation requires an opening from the Divine. Of course the door has to be opened in order for that to take place. However, in such a fashion, it is not understood as power. So, the child then, requires security and the security is the love of the parents. In reality of course, if the parents were capable of loving to the extent we are talking about then another person involved would not take anything away from the children. But, in ordinary sense the feminine wants security. They want someone that is going to provide the space for the children to be nurtured as is the roles that were chosen in the beginning.

So the masculine is preset to explore the outer world. To bring back from the outer world that which will sustain the family. The feminine is predisposed to nurturing and feeding her family, including the father that is busy taking care of the outer world. So there is an outer world and an inner world and if you look at traditional families all over your planet, power of the inner world lies with the feminine and power in the outer world and the protective world lies with the masculine.

Warfare causing disturbance to the balance between masculine and feminine

M: It is only in the disturbance, the disturbances brought about by greeds that set man against man in what is called global warfare, that pulls the men so totally from their roles, from providing into only protecting and therefore the feminine was forced into the outer world to provide and to nurture. 

The result of course, is a disturbance in the fields. When the men returned from their (warfare) role and from the disturbance that role provided, it brought back with it the energy of war. At the time then, the feminine wanted to withhold, to hold its own position, and that set about a war between male and female. And that war has continued on because there is no respect from either side. Then the role of “nurture” disappeared entirely so all you have is that of protection and sustenance.

A: Yeah, survival stuff, isn’t it.

M: And each one sees the only opportunities for both of these is in the external world of economics. And so this is maintained and will continue until the feminine recognises femininity. Because it is the feminine that is in the wrong place. The masculine is still in its own role even if it is only half of it. So there is competition.

What has taken over the imagination of the people is competition. Your greatest leaders, that is those that are paid the most money, are those involved in competitive endeavours. (Sport, business and politics.)  So that makes it right that the masculine cannot look after their own, is therefore cast out and so becomes the evils of society.

A: Would you ever get to the stage in the future where the highest paid jobs are those of nurturing?

M: Let us say, until the feminine returns and makes that a principal, that it is as equal value, if not greater than. The equal value is within the nurturing and the sustenance of a society. But you have created further planetary wars to take care of the displaced masculine (to give them something to do)  and that will continue until there is the wake up call. And even the spiritual leaders do not call for this.

A: Well that’s because most of them are male. (laughs)

M: That is not the case.

A: Oh

M: Most of them are actually female because it is not in the organised religions that it occurs.

A: No no. They don’t have as big a profiles as the ones for the religions though.

M: The old school continues to try to force the world back into balance and the new religions need to encourage the recognition of the differences and the respect for difference so that polarity can rebalance itself.

A: Yes I understand that. OK Thank you very much. I hope it recorded so I can type it up for my friends.

M: Then thank you so much for your time and your interest and we will talk again.

A: We will. Thank you very much.

M: Then thank you and good afternoon.

A: Good afternoon.

—-

END

Did you enjoy the article? The KitegirlCoach blog is dedicated to collecting info and insights on the World Shift of Consciousness, Law of Attraction and improving Creative Careers. Feel free to SHARE the articles amongst like minded friends, FOLLOW on WordPress for a regular feed or SUBSCRIBE for a monthly synopsis of articles.