Another great session on Monday with Mercredan on our evolving Consciousness – transcript is below. If you’ve ever wondered why all that terrible stuff had to happen in World War II, this conversation contains another clue. There was more about us as a changing species and planet this time too which he hasn’t mentioned for a while – more of the big picture.

Mercredan brought up an interesting idea about identifying the ideas imposed by parents. I worked on an exercise to help bring those out over this week which I will type up for you in a few days.

Annabelle

Mercredan session

30 May 2016

Channelled by Francis Evans

Interviewed by Annabelle Drumm

Click here to learn more: Who is Mercredan?

Topics: simplifying and letting go, parenting influence on children, freeing the mind, living life by consequences, looking at the bigger picture, past lives and learning over a lifetime, changing history, Adolf Hitler, resolving the revenge issues

BEGIN

—-

M: Good morning and once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. The world evolves in cycles. There are cycles within cycles within cycles. Vast cycles and personal cycles. Things begin with a conception and evolve over a lifetime to the conclusion that births the next cycle, whether that is individual or social, civilisational and so forth. Everything in its place. The difficulty for humankind has always come from the conclusion. Always more difficult to finish than it is to begin something new. Humans often find it difficult to connect what has been learned and tie it into a final analysis, that is a final conclusion, so that One can understand how that produced the consequences and conclusions that brought that about. In other words, when One is at the phase of ending some process, shall we say, what is the consequence? What is the actions and how that unfolds. Do you understand what I mean?

A: Yes, in many ways.

M: So, a life cycle is a beginning, a birth and the process of consequences that leads inevitably to its conclusion. It is that One holds to the end of the conclusion only by holding on to the old frameworks, old ideas and so forth. That is enough to stimulate a conversation.

A: Mm yes. It feels to me though we are… well as you said, that it refers to everything. I wonder if there is something we can offer our dear friend (the channeller) along these lines as he is currently trying to conclude and wind up before he starts something new.

M: In the end, when One holds onto things, even if they are minor, the consequence is that it “peaks” at the end period of time. Then One eventually has to release it as easily as you can.

A: What do you mean by “peaks”?

Simplifying and letting go

M: If One has no need to hang onto things, then as they come, the usefulness is perceived and they are released along the journey as it were, then One is not met at the end with too many options. I am not saying that my dear friend has held on because that is not truly the case but, over time, the accumulation always seems to take effect and simplification is what is required. Not just in his own personal journey but in the journey of the cycle of the civilisation because humans in the new species will find it more difficult to keep up with the ever increasing choices and eventually will realise it is not necessary. In other words, as we have pointed out, technology simply emulates the natural ability of the human organ. So, there are only certain necessary qualities. For example, you might say “But what about the requirements for a physical article?” That is, do you not need the printer to print out a copy so that it is solidified? But that is unnecessary if the memory is so attuned that it can not only remember what is being provided but updates it as that information comes into being.

A: Mm, mm.

M: You understand, if One can rely on One’s inner tapping into the records then what is the point? You understand you are in a different framework and as such then, a different quality than One’s interactions and One’s creativity provide the 3 dimensional structure, the co-ordinates in which to operate.

A: Mm. So if we look at civilisation as a whole, many of the lessons you have given me around around resolving baggage and old beliefs and getting rid of identities, and if there was a way of getting that news out to civilisation, not just in the book of my own journey but, to get them to question “What do we need to keep if we did simplify?” Is there a way you can suggest that would be useful in getting that message out? What would you focus on? I mean there’s so many things to focus on.

M: We have talked about letting go of the identity but, your identity is the structure in which you occupy.

A: OK maybe it’s the wrong word. I mean personality traits which no longer benefit.

M: Shall we say this. When you look around your environment, around your kitchen, around your living spaces, all you see is yourself. Your identity is in everything and not just that, but it is imposed upon anybody to enters into the environment. You understand?

A: Yes I do.

Parenting influence on children

M: Your children, then, are much more than themselves. They are your identity imposed upon their choices. So they build their own identity from their exposure to your own and that has gone on for generations. Whereas if you simplify, there is much less going on around that is imposed upon them. Once the inner qualities are activated, the only quality that is imposed is activating the inner qualities and once that occurs then every individual can sort out what is themselves and what is another. So you start to see that your children are not your belongings.

A: No

M: Even if you think that they are themselves, you look at their qualities and their personalities. In reality, of course, they are not themselves at all because you are not even your own self.

A: (laughs) How every confusing.

M: When you look into yourself you can see, what is it that you most often rail against? What you find disturbing, that is holding you back, is only the qualities that were imposed upon you as conditions for belonging to a family. In other words conditions to belong. Do you understand what I mean?

A: Yes, well, I try and think what I rally against…. If I look at… because I’m assuming whatever I throw at my children is probably what I am rallying against myself.

M: Of course.

A: Yes, but I would say that the things that are on my mind are facing responsibility, finding self discipline…

M: Of course, but also you want to be yourself. So you make out, “Be yourself! Be all that you can be.” You still give your children the message and then you hold them in your responsibility framework. The encouragement for excitement and freedom rails against the need for responsibility in actions. You understand?

A: No I don’t because I thought that the idea is as we “grow up” spiritually that we do become more responsible.

M: Exactly that. And the question is, does One teach that you can do whatever you want but consequences will be the result? When One says to somebody, ”You do not have to be responsible because consequences will determine. So if you wish to lack responsibility then, you inherently wish for the pain that will inevitably come from it.” You understand what I mean?

A: Yes I do. So rather than lecturing about being responsible it is better to talk about consequences so that they can make their own decision.

M: Of course and it is not your consequences. It is not what you are putting. It is what occurs naturally from such behaviour. If you are self centred, for example, others will distance themselves from you. They will see through you. They will not trust and you will not find happiness in that arrangement. So if you wish for happiness then, better to explore the nature that will bring that as a consequence. Nobody can tell another person what that is so they must learn how to perceive consequences as early as possible. So you are taking away all of the rules that control things, the conditions that are everywhere within your physical environment.

A: Yes of which there seems to be more and more in the community.

M: Of course.

A: They are doing the opposite, aren’t they. They’re not helping people learn about consequences, they’re just trying to control them which makes people rebel more and then they get more irresponsible.

M: Of course and then you have your society which lacks any empathy for anybody else. You have turned it into a free for all grab zone and more and more possessions that are drowning you. Even when technology shows you the results of people who are drowning in a quagmire of nonsense, you look at them and you laugh at their stupidity and yet, all around, you are doing exactly the same.

A: (laughs) Oh dear.

M: You understand, different things of course, but still heavy loads to carry and then you meet the consequences of giving up your dearest possessions.

A: Yes. I want…

M: … I just want to complete that – In the end, that is why so many people hold onto life even when life is not worth hanging on to at all. They’re hanging on because they do not want to let go of all of their things, as if you cannot take the memory of your children with you. You have to have the photographs and…

A: videos

M: Videos and the drawings and everything else to remind you when they are not even the same as when they were taken (photos and videos). 

A: Mm

M: Do not want your children to have freedom and that is of course because, why should they have freedom when you have never allowed it for yourself? And you were never allowed it when you were a child and even when you meet your parents they still want to make you a child.

Freeing the mind

A: Yes. Well if we were going to go from this very point with this particular body and say “OK, let’s give her freedom.” What does she need to be free? What are the things that hold her back the most? I would think that mental beliefs would be the biggest thing that hold her back rather than physical.

M: If you look at yourself what holds you back most of all? From your freedom, that is.

A: Is it fear of consequences?

M: Of course. You understand, what is the thing most is your responsibility.

A: Yes indeed.

M: Because it is your responsibility, and only your responsibility, for your children’s behaviours because they have no freedom. You cannot trust that they will not have challenges, that they will not find themselves in difficult circumstances, that they are not wise enough.

A: And surely that is just a reflection on lack of trust of self as well?

M: Of course. Because if you truly brought them into the world then they would have their own innate sense of security.

A: Mm, which I’ve probably beaten out of them by this stage.

M: Of course.

A: (laughs)

M: Because you send them to the education.

A: Ugh

M: That is, to be conditioned to be productive members of your society. In other words, so they fit in to the cogs so it continues in the old way. It is at this point that it is, what we have said, the old cycle in conclusion. The cycle of species which is of course, far greater than the cycle of a civilisation. The species has outlasted itself and, as we have pointed out, in its dying throws it still wants to hang on to the old ways.

A: Right, so in order for the species to learn to let go – because this is the last of this species, right? The new species are being born now.

M: Of course.

A: What can help them learn to let go? I know you could force them with Mother Earth deciding to do some catastrophe.

M: Of course that is what is happening but is it…

A: That’s not the only way though. Are there ways that we can help?

M: How it is that One finds Oneself? Because until One opens the “cell door”, shall we say, until One releases Oneself from the prisons of mind, nothing can transform. Until you truly perceive the prisons that you have created, in other words, when you look at how you perceive the world, how you see yourself, how you feel in the world; how can you possibly recognise it is consequence that has lead to this?

A: Mm, alright. The series of questions you gave me before around consequence have been very useful. I’ve used them a number of times now.

Living life by consequences

M: When you start to live life from consequences then you start to put yourself at the other end of the time framework. You understand, we have talked quite a lot about the extra dimensions. When you start to see that time is a framework just as solid as a particular dimension of length or so on, then there are different avenues. That is, One is not necessarily looking at past, present and future, but if One considers future as consequence, then in the present, One can perceive what is the result of the action? Then One adjusts the present in light of the future and One’s reference library of experience then, is what has happened in the past. In other words, when some consequence occurs, then what must I have done to bring this into being? When you determine that the consequence has nothing to do with your own actions, then of course you are in denial.

A: I was just thinking of the example where a child is brought up with parents who are very conservative and very limiting, controlling. When you get to be an adult, is it just to do with the reaction to the parents that is the way that you take it on yourself? How can you not say anything at all about the parents contribution to that?

Looking at the bigger picture

M: The difficulty with such conditions is that One is determined not by the conditions but how One accepts the conditions and how One manages life. Do you understand? One can live within the controlling environment of the parent and still be free. That is One can manage the world beyond the control because One is perceptive. Then the parents find it difficult to deal with the magical quality of this child’s life. No matter how much they put on the child, the child transforms it.

A: Mm, but with such a controlling parent would they not just step up the control and make it even more violent or more controlling?

M: That is difficult to say exactly but let us say this. A child that is magical often brings the concern back on to the parent. Often then, if the parent is a violent parent, shall we take for example, the parent most often is frightened of the child, because they may learn very early, if they unleash their violence, consequences occur for them. So better to leave the child alone and let them do their own thing. So the child is not that they are rebelling as much as they are transforming.

A: Yes, continuing to be magical.

Past Lives and Learning over a Lifetime

M: Of course and there are plenty of examples of such beings. Usually of course, a child will choose its parent in line with the qualities it would choose to develop over the lifetime. So someone who has been out of control, that has done things that are not so wise, will often choose a controlling parent to impose rules and regulations. Then when they come to adolescence and they break out, they have been enough innately conditioned to be able to learn self control even if, in the beginning, they do not.

A: Mm, so it’s kind of a balancing trick then.

M: Of course, because One is in the process of getting to the end of the life (and a life a the end of a species cycle, at that) and completing as much perception, as much wisdom as possible.

A: Mm. When you speak of that though, in the example you’ve given, that’s two lives which appear to be in a line. I don’t quite understand this, it’s sort of linear then. So if you have an out of control life, and say you get drunk and wrap your car around a pole and die, then you come back again with controlling parents, then that is not a consequence but a reaction to the last life which kind of makes it one ahead of the other. How does that work? (I am questioning this based on what he has told me previously about all lifetimes existing simultaneously in the same field rather than time being linear in one direction.) 

M: Not always. You understand, when One experiences such a lifetime, One loses control and dies in the process, after the period of unfurling and the choices that comes about, One is looking then for a position that has such controls imposed, in place…

A: Are they necessarily put forward though, in the ages? (later years) You can go back and do one in the 15th Century?

M: Of course.

A: Right

M: Then One might choose to be “slave” and under such conditions one is in total control [of another]. One can, having learned the lesson, One begins to ascend in the roles to become “trusted slave”, often with lots of freedom.

Changing history

A: Right OK. And also, when I did some regression hypnotherapy, you confirmed that what we had done had changed the life that we were looking at – that was the poor boy that was freezing to death on the street – if we change that life and it affects another life … so surely that means that history changes constantly anyway.

M: That is correct.

A: So how can we write anything in a book if all this time … do the books change?

M: It is all in a fluid nature and shall we say, the books fall out of date. New things seem to overtake. The book seems not to be accurate or not to represent and eventually fall out of print and become oddities in people’s collections.

A: So the text doesn’t change?

M: Often not. (often not definitely?) Mostly, the texts simply disappear. And, often this is not an historical manifesto. In other words, mostly lifetimes occur in ordinary populations, not in history making ones.

A: I see, right. They must change as well though.

Adolf Hitler

M: Of course but in most cases the resonance requires lots of different opinions. In other words, shall we take the example of an Adolf Hitler. Because of the consequence of actions, this one is appealing to many different beings who wish to experience absolute control and absolute lack of control. Personal lack of control and social absolute control.

A: How did it appeal to so many at the same time? Did it draw in many people from many many different eras all into that one lifetime?

M: Many have been watching and waiting for the perfect environment in which to engage, in which to seek revenge and so on and so forth.

A: Perfect for so many things then, wasn’t it.

M: Of course. So many people wanting to experience what they have delivered to others and the result then, there are many opportunities to become victim or perpetrator but, in the end, those that are the guiding force, the higher officers of the process, offer many opportunities for individuals to explore ultimate control.

Resolving the revenge issues

A:  So as history gradually changes, as each soul rises and ascends in the inner world, will all of that World War II period…

M: Resolve

A: Fold back, right.

M: You understand, because while you make certain ones victims and perpetrators, there is no recognition of the interconnectedness of the choices.

A: That’s coz we can’t see them down here.

M: Of course and if One looks from then on, One can almost easily see how that has transformed into exactly the same situation. In other words, the same groups are swapping roles from victim to perpetrator back to victim and so on. They have not yet learned the equality equation. You understand then in this instance, one group sees itself as special, a second group sees itself as special (Jews vs. Aryan race) and annihilates the first group so their specialness is extended and stamped into history. The second (first?) group then re-emerges and remounts it’s requirement for specialness and stamps its authority on everybody else (Jews vs. Palestinians and Western World etc.) and a group then becomes the latest victim which eventually begins to assert itself on the rest (ISIL) and on it goes.

A: Mm, its carrying on the family tradition, isn’t it. This is the conditioning of parents.

M: Of course.

A: So with the new species coming about, will that dampen it a little?

M: Shall we say, the new species automatically understand the principle of interconnectedness. They can automatically see the results and consequences of thinking certain ways.

A: Does that mean that within 30, 40, 50 years we will run out of wars?

M: Even before that, the old system will not continue to be productive in such a sense. Values are already transforming.

A: Mm. No wonder this is an exciting time to be alive.

M: Of course.

A: (laughs)

M: Because it is the end times. Reading of course, not that the planet is ending, not that civilisation is ending, but the old ways of acting and being and thinking are concluding.

A: But with each of us in our little 3D bodies, in a single life time – for that is all that most of us can see – is it possible for us to wind up, you said draw up all the information to make a final conclusion…

M: Of course

A: Can we see enough of that in this little body to be able to do that or do we need to be in that unfurling stage (just after physical death) in order to truly conclude on it?

M: As soon as One is disconnected from the physical reality as existence, that is when One subtlety recognises One creates everything, then One realises One is not limited to a physical incarnation. Then transformative, One realises that One’s life is not limited to the physical body at all and that One can drop the physical body and continue the journey.

A: But when you get to that point and you have that choice, you can still do your conclusion? You can round it all up?

M: Of course, you have already rounded it up, as you say. You have already drawn together all the threads and recognised it was all a beautiful television drama.

A: (laughs) I thought you were going to say it was all a big joke. (laughs) Not really. An experiment. An experience.

M: You understand, you are watching your movies of war and destruction and you can see the cracks in it. Then you start to be amused. What nonsense this is, how this hero is just the focus. This is the better paid actor. The surviving actor. The hero of the story that maintains it by the most unlikely events.

A: Yes and killing everybody else like he’s meant to be the hero.

M: Of course.

A: (laughs)

M: So when One perceives it as that, then what else is there left to hold on to?

A: That’s right, then you can let it all go.

M: Of course and the paradox is you can take it all with you.

A: Yes indeed. (laughs) Ok.

M: Is that enough for today?

A: A beautiful lesson, yes. Thank you.

M: Then thank you and good morning.

A: Good morning.

—-

END

Did you enjoy this article? The Kitegirl Coach blog is dedicated to collecting and considering information on the planetary and human evolution, Law of Attraction, the world shift in consciousness and creative careers. SHARE with like minded friends, FOLLOW on WordPress (button in the right column) for a regular feed or SUBSCRIBE for a monthly update on articles.