This session Mercredan and our friend Susan seemed quite heavy and took a while to process afterwards. We all added our comments for each other afterwards which I thought I would share with you. They are intimate but we all have our doubts about ourselves so I think it’s good for you to see that we all have them. We are no different to you. 🙂

Topics: “The Great Descent” discussed here in our movement from Lemuria to Atlantis to 3D Earth, when a soul enters a baby incarnate, channeling, “bleed” of characters when connecting, personal evolution, shift of consciousness, learning from past experiencs.

Susan input in green.
Francis input in red.
Annabelle input in blue.

Mercredan session channelled by Francis Evans
Interviewed by Susan
12 May 2015

BEGIN

—

M: Good afternoon. Once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. At the beginning of every great movement there is always a shift in the nature of experience, a shift in the way that human beings operate and relate to one another. In the past, then, as The Great Descent occurred, so many things, so many ideas were lost in the framework that that represents. So often you are wondering, “Why is it that the past does not seem to have left behind even a minimal trail? How is it that an entire history can overlook what went before?” So that is enough to continue our conversation as it has been. So let us begin.

S: Wow. That was kind of. Um… I’m really not… I began to think about my prior lifetimes that you were were discussing in a prior session, and wondering if that’s what you were referring to, that somehow I keep repeating my own history over and over again. Is that what you were saying?

M: Let us say that we began a discussion about the past, the Old Age and the old conditions, what you have called the land of Mu and the land of Atl, that is Atlantis and Lemuria. And wondering why there are no physical markers of such great passages as it were.

S: Yes. (I’m confused.)

M: And in the last episode we discussed what the difference was between what we called the Third evolution and the Fourth. [3^rd & 4^th Root races? Yes I agree, moving down into 3D] That is, how is it that those that came from the astral planes, from those places where desires took precedence. So it is that the magnetic qualities began to separate out individuality in terms of one’s owning one’s own concept — one’s emotions and their impact.

The quality of magic as it is understood. That later began to physicalize in what you call the age of the Atlanteans. Unfortunately, such [long pause] structures only required environments because one at that point could live within the boundaries of one’s own necessary creation. One could build a castle in the air! [he is talking about the mental plane? I think Atlantians would create in the higher dimensions which also feel to be solid but never show in the 3D view. They didn’t have to follow the same rules we think govern us now.] One could imagine, like an architect, one’s castle and quite cozily live within it. So the physicality of such a system was not truly brought into place until the very last vestiges of it, and there are such remaining structures still evident in your current place. [physical buildings from the last atlantean phase?] Such are the great pyramids, not just in what you call Egypt but in many other places as well, some of which are under your oceans and some are buried under debris and indeed the icepack.

S: And those are the remnants of what little physical material there was from Atlantis.

M: That is correct. Prior to that. So at the end of that realm, that consciousness, there emerged a new beginning which was entirely in the physical realm, beginning of course at early man and their necessary interaction with the physical plane in the need to build in solid terms such structures in which to house and to shelter.

S: So that was a further descending.

M: Of course. And at a certain turning point, one begins to emerge as what you would call science and physicality, and the desire to ascend began to take place in what you would, in your current conservative estimation, call the Reformation. The re-formation? Of course not! Many other cultures were much further advanced at that time. (This may possibly mean the English Reformation after the middle ages compared to the Asian and Middle East cultures being more “civilised” in that era.) But evolution as such began to bring humanity out of its own descent into physicality. One began to value human relationships, interactions. Began to understand the nature of helpfulness and friendship, and eventually the nature of ideas and creations. At the point at which you would call The Turning, now is the ascent into the next less physical framework, much more at the Atlantean building of one’s own castles in which one can indeed shelter. [Is he signalling a return to the previous mental Atlantean planes of existence? Yes I believe so. Another person I deal with who regularly works on these planes under meditation says it feels just as solid as 3D.]

S: Got it. So have we descended now as far as we’re going to descend? Now we’re all going to be able to ascend back?

M: As we have pointed out, there is a necessary need to value the inner workings before one can truly identify with them. The result is the separation of two distinct universal viewpoints. And of course one can only create inside of one’s basic ideas. So one creates reality from the ideas and the potentials one allows oneself to experience. (I’m thinking he means this will be different for each of us. Some will ascend, some will choose to do so later.)

S: Okay. [I feel discouraged, as if Mercredan is telling me my viewpoint is too limited to progress on my own. I’m afraid I’m going to get left behind in the old framework!] Is there a reason that our dear friend (Francis the channeller) and our sweet Australian friend (Annabelle) and I will all be together in a month or so, here?

M: There is of course the willingness. One has worked for many years to arrive at the point where one is willing to integrate with another. That is, to truly accept others into one’s framework. And, as my dear friend (Francis) was picking up, taking on our analogy of the Author of one’s own experience, the Author not only of one’s personal experience but the identification with the characters within that creation. When you co-create each other, one then begins to understand the nature of the authors’ collective. Then you begin to support each other in one’s personal evolution. Because you begin to write in your own novel such evolutionary experience. So you move out of creating one’s own personal reality to co-creating a shared reality. [reference here to working together in ‘the team‘ as Merc has already explored. The writer’s cooperative writing another into your own novel. A very provocative idea of ‘integrating with another in order to truly understand their perspective and writing that into your own narative.]

S: And I think that’s where I was going with the question. Are the actions we’re currently taking, co-creating, somehow going to helpful to all of us to ascend better?

M: That is the point. One begins to integrate not just on an intellectual level, but one begins to understand the nature of what one would call “bleed.” That is experiences of one and another emerging into a shared reality. The question then is openness to such an experience. Allowing another not only to see the physical or to share some portions of self, but allowing others into the most intimate places of life, without judgement, so you are learning: “Is it possible to trust another without having to suffer from criticism?”

S: Right. And I kind of feel when I sit in this chair that I’m doing that with Mercredan — that I’m giving permission, just by being here, for Mercredan to see everything there is to see about me.

M: And that, of course, is an obvious reality. The question is, “What is Mercredan as such? What is it that we are exploring together?” [Is he asking Susan to find her own Mercredan inside? Is he suggesting that ‘her’ Mercredan is a character in ‘her’ novel? Interesting concept! I think he was originally talking about letting other people see your intimate side rather than just Mercredan. Then as we share our evolution without criticism the bleed occurs.]

S: We’ve asked ourselves that question.

M: If you think it is some “thing” that is attached to my dear friend, then there is an exclusory nature to that. However, if it is a space like a room in which you can enter in, then all that my dear friend is doing is holding open the door while you join in the party! Then you begin to understand how to invite others in and not only that, but you begin how to open the door for yourself, for your own. For everybody has their own doorway and their own key to this space. So there is no exclusion, only getting prepared, only being safe enough to enter in, to find out what you will find out. Because if all things are to be accessible, even one’s worst fears can be unleashed if one is not maintaining one’s sense of management. (He’s talked about this before. The reason to become very disciplined in our minds so we only focus on what is most beneficial. Once you’re in the door you create everything instantly so you only want to create the good stuff!)

So it is important that you remain the master of your own (unfolding?) (involvement?). That you are not, shall we say, like the sorcerers’ apprentice, delving into the book before you are ready for its magic. [He is warning to have some understanding before you fly single?] There are many stories of this, of tinkering without having all of the training. So it is important that you come into this position with guidance, with someone who will manage that you are not overly exposed. Do you understand this? [Merc is preparing the way to touch base with your own Higher Self/Consciousness Yep, I agree.]

S: Yes, but who’s to provide that guidance?

M: Let us say my dear friend has managed quite well in that regard. (Francis connects by removing self from the conversation so it can’t create anything that is not beneficial.)

S: He has?

M: That is correct. And before him, his own teacher managed that involvement of course. [Referring to Margaret, Francis’ channelling teacher from when he was a young adult.] There was an evolution necessary in order that he was able to manage this. You understand why in the past safety has been such a big concern, that one asks the ascended beings and so on to provide protection, because you cannot trust yourself from (building? tinkering?).

I want to give an example. Because you asked about lifetimes. Of course we could simply open the book and allow all the lifetimes to flood out, and then you would be overwhelmed and carried away with all sorts of emotions that are unimportant in the scheme of things. However, as a human being without such training, one would pick upon some item and magnify it into a destructive force in your life. So when we are exploring such lifetimes, we allow only the necessary to be exposed. Only enough so that you can manage that experience. [referring to delving into hundreds of past-lives which he claims are only lives with which you, in this experience, resonate with. The you might build yourself to be self-important, or unworthy and act that out, instead of living your life to the fullest. or seek revenge on a present person for something they did in the past.]

S: I understand. Our dear friend told me once that he thinks of Mercredan as just an expression of his own higher self. But you said that we all can access that space…

M: Let us put it this way. The doorway that you are entering into the space through is the dressing room of Mr. Mercredan! And next door is your own doorway with its own star on it! It is your own dressing room, however, inside is the same space. [Nice way of saying you are the star on your own tonight show]

S: Right. So at some point in this ascension that we’re all hoping and striving for and trying to create, will we all be able to go through that door and access that space at some point, if we really want to get there?

M: Provided one is open and willing, provided one is not clouding the waters with one’s ideas that are carried along. But you have to understand that for many people, they have other driving forces clouding the way. For example, if you want to be filled with… want to gain fame and want followers, then of course that will cloud the open space, and you will only see what is inside through that filter and through the Merc that that will put in place. [another warning to stay clear of desires Using access to your higher self to gain for the ego rather than for the whole. ]

S: Okay. So is there a way for… We are so caught up in being in the story, it seems to me there is no way to know how clouded up our own stuff is…

M: Let yourself go. Let yourself ascend at least back into the office — that is, behind the typewriter, being the author. Then you can look down at your creation. You can look down at your story, and often when you are writing a story you are not so happy with the character that you have created. The question is this: “What event would you put in place that would suddenly awaken this character to their true higher purpose?” Do you follow what I mean?

S: Kind of. It’s hard for me to imagine what that would be. [This seems to be the biggest challenge for most people. There seems to me to be a connection between passion and purpose. In NLP we often talked about ]

M: If you take yourself out of your life and you look at it in the whole, what is missing? What is it that has been returned, if you like, planted as a pearl in the ground to be picked up, and that one has simply missed it? It is not about judging the character. It is about the evolution of a being from its early beginnings to a rounded point where they are ready to pass out of the physical world. So if you look at yourself with compassion, without judgements or criticisms, only looking at, “What could happen? What is it that this Great Being is missing? Just a little pearl and how would I place it in front of them? What is it that she worries about? What is it that she carries on inside herself about? What is it that she rails against?” All of these are simply markers trying to get you to pick up the pearl! [You might pick this up as a criticism, but I sense that he is suggesting that you are on the verge of making sense of your entire life. Like finding a key to a puzzle that has stumped you for years. I feel its an exciting prospect. Me too!]

S: I am so obtuse, I just can’t see the pearl! I feel like I’ve got markers everywhere and I’m still missing it!

M: Of course, that is the point. Because you are trying too hard. You are trying, and in the end there is a subtle judgement that you are not smart enough, that you are not clean enough, you are not spiritual enough. There is many criticisms, instead of looking at what is in front of you. That is, stop it all and be present! And when someone comes into your life, be present for them. And this is what we are hoping to occur is that when all of you are accumulated in a single spot, you will understand and learn how to be present. [I hope we will have time and space to make this happen. Rest assured we can do this. 😉]

S: Oh, that would be fabulous!

M: You understand, not in the mind, but totally present in the extraordinary moment that will happen. So all of the excuses are simply what they are. Being present is an extraordinary opportunity. So that one of the advantages is that when people get to be present together, they alter their fields, they help each other to generate a field of compassion, acceptance, and freedom from criticism. So then when others come into the field, then they will find pure acceptance. [Is he giving a subtle hint here of what to work on?]

S: Okay.

M: Then you have less need to explain yourself. Less need to engage yourself. “Engaging” being on a mental level, that is by talking and so on. Simply being present in the moment. So there is time to engage that ability.

S: I was hoping for that, but we’ll see.

M: I want to point out that you may not have connected our introduction to this level of being. You are eager to engage in the pathway of evolution, that is shifting to what was the Atlantean age in its (eternal? this would make sense) (returning ? returning from the descent – this gets my vote) journey. Shifting from the negative and self-absorbed nature of magic into the personal use of magic for the benefit of the evolution of humanity.

S: Yeah. In my conscious thinking that’s what I want. But I have a feeling that underneath it all, I’m stuck back on the other of being self indulgent and self absorbed. I don’t want to be, but I think I must be because I’m still stuck in the story. [my question is “who would you be if you weren’t you? If you put down the book and stopped reading, what sort of person would write such a story?”]

M: You mentioned in your previous conversation that you have the results of an accident holding you in a certain place, and yet it was no accident that such an “accident” came simply as a mechanism to stop what you were indulging in.

S: I hear what you’re saying. I don’t know what it is I was indulging in.

M: I suggest that you review the circumstances. Not the event, but the circumstances of the life at that time. And understand that such a shock can be both holding one up, holding one back, and catapulting one into a different position. The paradox is that opposite extremes fold in upon themselves. The law of paradox suggests that once one arrives at the outer extreme, that is the outermost extremity, one suddenly realizes that the two arms of the paradox are consistent. They are the same thing! [He once described the Law of Paradox as two extremes that are both true and false at the same time, and that once you arrive fully at one extreme you discover it is actually the opposite extreme wrapping around itself, if I’ve got that right.]

S: I kind of understand. I’m still not sure what you’re saying about that particular accident that wasn’t an accident. I just need some time to go back to that time in my life and try to remember what was going on specifically. Other than my other issue, I’m not sure…

M: You understand, not just your other issue, but those that are close by. That other, of course, is a part of self. You cannot escape from your projections onto others. Does that make sense?

S: It does. It’s still a quandary to me about how to get out of… It feels like I’m in a well and I’m not sure what I see except tall sides I don’t see it yet, but maybe I will after I listen to it again a few time and hear what you’re saying more. Right now I don’t know how to translate what you’re saying into what I know consciously.  [I think he’s saying that you’re separating yourself out from the novel, and your character is becoming victim to another of your characters. Of course, you wrote both of them into the story, and it would be a poor story without some drama! If you can’t or won’t laugh at the character then you remain trapped in the story. If you see them both equally, then you become the author, and can review the relationship. Beautifully put.]

M: I will leave it at this point, because one has to know when enough is enough. When enough fuel on the fire is enough for it to get started again. Because you need to regenerate. You need to release all of the tied up energy in that experience. [he’s saying that you’re wasting energy on the right-wrong game, rather than the pearl of wisdom this scene contains]

S: Hmmm. It felt like it got released when the problem went away. I don’t know how to do what you’re saying. It’s kind of like the hose that I thought was empty, but seems there must be more water in the line that I don’t know is there, and it must be affecting me. Could you explain this just a little bit more?

M: I want to say that whatever is residual is residual because you are feeding it with yourself. You are holding yourself back as a result of that interaction. You know what I mean. You are using the experience, the non-accident accident as a method for stopping yourself being at risk.

S: Oh! Okay. So. Hmmm. Well, I’ll think on that one. I wonder what I’m at risk of. Hmmm.  [many people run the fear of the unknown. Don’t do anything that you can’t control, that you haven’t got all the information on. The new humans seem to be willing to take huge risks, because they think there isn’t anything they can’t recover from. They know they create it all anyway]

M: Do you understand, that if you go outside, then you become more at risk. You are ever more exposed to the risks of life. (I wonder if this is about you isolating yourself, as each of us has done in our own way.) And underneath that risk of life is the idea that you are not safe within it. When one assumes one is not safe within life, one then makes life physical. And when one makes life physical, one begins to avoid life because the ultimate end point is death. All of this is because one does not truly believe that death is yet another doorway into a new experience. It is not yet the exciting possibility that it truly is.

S: But on a conscious level, that IS what I think! [I cannot even believe I am arguing with Mercredan!] As I sit here, I’m excited about death.  It does seem like a new door, and a new adventure, and a continuation.  [Is he tapping into something to do with the “other”? Or the “accident”? It seems as if this is where the discussion came from]

M: I will leave you to ponder on that.

S: Oh, that’s going to be a deep one to try to figure out.

M: I am going to suggest not to figure it out, but to ponder on it. (No brain work! Only contemplation and allowing intuition to give you the answer.) Put it into the pot and boil it up so that it can open its petals (Ever seen flowering tea?). That you are not thinking and trying to dig it apart, but you are enticing it to show its beauty.

S: Okay. Thank you Mercredan. I’ll try. We’ll hope that the fire catches from that. [very long pause] Is there anything else you’d like to say before we end this?

M: I have noth… Only if you have a question. Once again, stirring the infinite with questions is the best way to bring forth that which is ready to be understood.

When Does The Soul Enter A Baby?

S: I do have another question, then, that I’d [like] to ask, something that’s been on my mind in follow up to a discussion we had awhile ago. You said that the first step that we have is we choose to enter this world, to assume physicality, is to be in the physical body and say, “I am awake.” At what point does the soul enter the physical body to begin to have the experiences of physicality? Is it before our physical birth? Can you explain that?

M: One expects that there is a single moment, but it is much more like trial and error. Most often, this is the normal, a soul will test its developing vehicle at early stage, coming in and orienting itself into the model, and begins to influence its general appearances. Often then it will come back at the time what is called the “quickening.” There begins to be movement and an attempt to fit in the body, to gain some sort of control over its operating system as it were. Then one might at this point choose which gender one is going to most usefully work with.

The most important thing is first of all there is the need to exist as a physical manifestation. One then chooses and moderates the physical vehicle into its gender. For others that often have a difficulty or a lack of willingness to incarnate in body as I would prefer, they might wait for quite a period of time. Then the baby, even after it is born, is often not fully embodied. The soul nature is still attempting to come to terms with the gravity of the situation.

Gravity is the degree of heaviness that every body has to deal with. Some people have a lightness of spirit and others have to deal with the gravity of their situation. So it is over some period of time that in the end all Beings have descended into their permanent vehicles. And for others, they may retain a certain disposition; they have a certain connection outside so they remain quite consciously connected to the higher vibrations.  [he is saying that a baby might not fully incarnate at birth. I wonder if some children never fully incarnate?]

S: You’re saying some souls after they incarnate can maintain a better connection than others.

M: Of course. They do not forget themselves into the physical nature of the world. And these ones often are what you would call quite perceptive, not just as you would say they are psychic, but they are more perceptive of what is happening around them.

S: I understand. Okay. That’s perfect. Thank you so much.

M: Is that enough for today?

S: It is. You’re absolutely wonderful and I appreciate it.

M: Then once again, such penetrating questions are invaluable as markers as you go forward in this fascinating life. Then thank you and good afternoon.

END

Did you enjoy this article? This blog is dedicated to learning about intuition, creative genius, Law of Attraction and our personal evolution in the World Shift of Consciousness. SHARE with like minded friends, FOLLOW in WordPress for a regular feed or SUBSCRIBE for monthly updates.